KEŞİF YOLCULUKLARI: Farklı Mana Açılımlarıyla, İzahlı ve Görsel Destekli Risale-i Nur Eğitim Programı

Medresetüzzehra Eğitim Yaklaşımı'nın Bilim Felsefesini Oluşturmaya Katkıda Bulunmayı Hedefleyen Akademik Eğitim Faaliyetleri


Yorum bırakın

Is It Possible That Material Factors in Nature Come Together and Create Living Beings?

Is It Possible That Material Factors in Nature Come Together and Create Living Beings?

This article is “2. International Congress of Creation in the Light of Sciences” Presentation.

Click Here Turkish Version

This article was prepared using our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)”Click Here for Book Page

For English Section Main Page Click Here (Other Articles, Utterly Different Experience Visual/Interactive Books and Training Program Presentations)

Abstract

The purpose of study is to clearly reveal out whether it is possible for the material factors in nature to come together and give life to things. Firstly, basic concepts such as “coincidence, material factors, the laws of nature, the mechanisms of evolution”, on which the existence of the material and the formation of an object is based, will be discussed and their features will be analysed.

Then, stating that a claim to form the base for the answer to a question like “What is the main reason for the creation of this object or that event?” should first make three issues clear.

The end of the analysis: It will be basically found that, it would be a non-scientific, difficult and vague way to try to explain the creation of an object through material factors and nature or by claiming that it has come out by itself.

This study will contribute to the determination of the fact that it would be more scientific, reasonable, rational and acceptable to explain the creation of an object with a Creator, as an alternative possibility involving required conveniences and that, if there was a scientifically acceptable model, such model would better deserve to be scientifically accepted.

Okumaya devam et


1 Yorum

The Scientific Compliance of the Thought of the Existence of a Creator and the Laws Of Nature

The Scientific Compliance of the Thought of the Existence of a Creator and the Laws Of Nature

(1. International Congress of Creation in the Light of Sciences Presentation)

Click Here Turkish Version

This article was prepared using our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)”Click Here for Book Page

For English Section Main Page Click Here (Other Articles, Utterly Different Experience Visual/Interactive Books and Training Program Presentations)

Abstract 

In this study, some inferences are made about the value of scientific approach and studies that investigate the evidence of the acceptance of the existence of a creator for the humanity and makes its inferences in this way and the worth of the scientific knowledge and interpretations in this direction. Also, some analyses have been made about how a scientific approach that accepts the Creator’s existence will be presented to the world of science.  The creation model is an upper model that deals with the one who operates the mechanisms and not with the nature of them and it does not address the approaches as evolution directly. In a world where some world-famous physicists try to explain the origins of the universe through laws and theories, the rotten atheism trap will be deciphered by clarifying the laws of nature in the clearest way and academic analyses. I will clearly and certainly be proved that the evolution cannot be an alternative to creation. This study will also contribute to the creation of a scientific model, interpretation and accepted scientific approaches that will be an alternative to the other scientific approaches about the existence of the creator.

Okumaya devam et


Yorum bırakın

How will the Civilization of Islam/Quran be Built? What does the Dream of Medresetüzzehra Express?

2-4

How will the Civilization of Islam/Quran be Built? What does the Dream of Medresetüzzehra Express?

Click Here Turkish Version

We talk about something new and very different: Mentioning Allah, even mentioning Him with justifications; and building a science approach and philosophy of science that will be approved and be presented to humanity totally differ from each other and have big cliffs between.

There is also this point: Telling what comes to your mind, mouth and heart at that moment, and telling the truths of faith with an academic program syllabus based on a written and systematic text and instruct it are also very different things like day and night… Okumaya devam et


Yorum bırakın

Risale-i Nur, Civilization of Islam/Quran and Philosophy of Science

3-4

Risale-i Nur, Civilization of Islam/Quran and Philosophy of Science

Click Here Turkish Version

We start with what should be understood when philosophy of science is mentioned. We understand this: It is a discipline that analyzes scientific methods in terms of reliability, critizes the purposes and functions of science, comes up with explanations based on ratinality on this subject. The definition of this expression is already in this direction. That is, it has nothing to do with materialist/atheist philosophy. Actually, it’s verily our subject. (That is, it is the very interest and should be the interest of those who set their hearts on Risale-i Nur which presents Islam to the understanding of the era in the most appropriate and rational way.) Okumaya devam et


1 Yorum

Is It Possible That Material Factors in Nature Come Together and Create Living Beings?

Is It Possible That Material Factors in Nature Come Together and Create Living Beings?

This article is “2. International Congress of Creation in the Light of Sciences” Presentation.

Abstract

The purpose of study is to clearly reveal out whether it is possible for the material factors in nature to come together and give life to things. Firstly, basic concepts such as “coincidence, material factors, the laws of nature, the mechanisms of evolution”, on which the existence of the material and the formation of an object is based, will be discussed and their features will be analysed.

Then, stating that a claim to form the base for the answer to a question like “What is the main reason for the creation of this object or that event?” should first make three issues clear.

The end of the analysis: It will be basically found that, it would be a non-scientific, difficult and vague way to try to explain the creation of an object through material factors and nature or by claiming that it has come out by itself.

This study will contribute to the determination of the fact that it would be more scientific, reasonable, rational and acceptable to explain the creation of an object with a Creator, as an alternative possibility involving required conveniences and that, if there was a scientifically acceptable model, such model would better deserve to be scientifically accepted.

Okumaya devam et


Yorum bırakın

The Strategies to Neutralize the Atheistic Evolution With Correct Academic Approaches

english-doc49fru-akademik-yaklac59fc4b1mlarla-ateistik-evrimi-etkisizlec59ftirme-stratejileri

The Strategies to Neutralize the Atheistic Evolution With Correct Academic Approaches

Click Here for Turkish Versiyon

For English Section Main Page Click Here (Other Articles, Utterly Different Experience Visual/Interactive Books and Training Program Presentations)

We are asking to you: Should we refuse all proponents of evolution, without categorization? Should we consider evolution as alternative, anti-thesis or opponent of creation and should we try to find answers to an opposing idea? We ask these questions both as a believer and also as someone who has certain sensitivity about academic approach.

Okumaya devam et


1 Yorum

How Is Everything Taking Place with Divine Power?

How Is Everything Taking Place with Divine Power?

Click Here Turkish Version

This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)” Click Here for Book Page

For English Section Main Page Click Here (Other Articles, Utterly Different Experience Visual/Interactive Books and Training Program Presentations)

The real faith in Oneness (Tawheed) is not complete with the simple acceptance of Allah as the creator of the apparent universe. Such a belief is the first step of the hierarchy of the faith, and comes short of fundamental qualities of the faith requested by Allah in his Quran.

In fact, what is really wanted is, in addition to acceptance of the fact that every matter and object appearing and every activity taking place in this universe is created directly and ruled by the divine power itself, the complete and absolute rejection of the existence of anything that is supposed to be interfering and assisting in these activities and rulings. This is an unbelievably great and magnificent issue. In order to reach this level of belief in Allah and a “doubtless and informed faith based on strong evidence”, it is necessary to make a serious and detailed investigation.

Okumaya devam et


2 Yorum

Approach to the Laws of Nature

Approach to the Laws of Nature

Click Here for Turkish Versiyon

This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)” Click Here for Book Page

For English Section Main Page Click Here (Other Articles, Utterly Different Experience Visual/Interactive Books and Training Program Presentations)

This article is very important for “Scientific Approaches and Studies Which Search for Evidences for Acceptance of Existence of A Creator.”

In a world where some world-famous physicists try to explain the origins of the universe through laws and theories, the rotten atheism trap will be deciphered by clarifying the laws of nature in the clearest way and academic analyses. I will clearly and certainly be proved that the evolution cannot be an alternative to creation. This study will also contribute to the creation of a scientific model, interpretation and accepted scientific approaches that will be an alternative to the other scientific approaches about the existence of the creator.

Okumaya devam et


1 Yorum

Important Points on Evolution, Atheism and Creation

Important Points on Evolution, Atheism and Creation

Click Here for Turkish Versiyon

This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)” Click Here for Book Page

For English Section Main Page Click Here (Other Articles, Utterly Different Experience Visual/Interactive Books and Training Program Presentations)

To prevent misunderstandings, we want to point out at first that the emphasis in this section is that even if evolution is a reality, it will not abolish the need of a creator, it will not be an alternative to creation and, evolution is nothing more than an explanation of operation mechanism.

In our article, the first sentences which could be misunderstood were clarified so as not to leave any blurred parts in the next sentences. Our reasons for not accepting an evolutionary approach that does not reject the Creator and even seeing it away from the scientific nature are explained in detail in our source book “The Nature Epistle Initiatives”, given at the end of the article.

Evolution is an alternative theory (which has characteristics of fiction and which resembles a science fiction story rather than a scientific theory) for “coming into existence and functioning of living beings”. The mechanism itself, this or that, is a variable independent of the fact whether there is a creator of the living beings or not, whether they come into being coincidentally. In other words, even if an evolutionary mechanism was working in the emergence of the living creatures, this would not necessarily eliminate the need for a Creator. (We would like to state that this phrase, which was said for examination and analysis purposes, should not be understood as a judgement.) Okumaya devam et


2 Yorum

Scientific Findings about Evolution and the Miracles of Quran

Scientific Findings about Evolution and the Miracles of Quran

Click Here for Turkish Versiyon

This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)” Click Here for Book Page

For English Section Main Page Click Here (Other Articles, Utterly Different Experience Visual/Interactive Books and Training Program Presentations)

First of all, let us express that there is no need, to tell one by one all the scientific findings about evolution and then to try refuting those which, so to say, are against Islam and to show the ones which are supporting Islam and with their evidence to show the rightness of Islam and to make an exaggerated effort in order to prove that Evolution does not contradict with Islam with a view to showing that Islam is not contrary to science. We explain the reasons for this below. By doing something essentially different with regard to evolution, we have tried to state the style of approach of Quran and Risale-i Nur, a real lesson of Quran, grasping the matter fundamentally and being formed around the fundamental purposes. “How should we answer such a question with an approach appropriate with Quran? Can we accept Evolution if we take coincidence and atheism out of it? Have all living things come into existence from a single cell, having evolved from each other? Our short answer to such questions is this:

Evolution and development are two different things. Allah creates the universe and the living beings through a process of development. He does not create it all of a sudden, not just like a magician taking the rabbit out of his hat out of blue. However, the creation of the first individuals could be out of nothingness. And it can be thought that, the creation of other individuals continues through certain processes of physical and natural development. In that matter, let us try to look at the issue from Allah’s perspective and make our deductions accordingly. A Master of Art, with limitless power, although he has the capability to make a limitless number of canvases and paintings, he does not make separate paintings over separate canvases, but he makes all his painting over a single canvas by making changes over the pictures/paintings. And even he uses the paints of all pictures to make new paintings! We wonder if this is logical. Does he have such a necessity or requirement? In that case, nature is just like the canvas over which individuals are painted. Now make your own decision. Which one seems more logical?

Now there is no point in denying the evolution (so to speak), not in the sense of coincidental development but rather as development processes decided and created by a divine Master of Art, because there is already a development process going on in the universe, which is clearly observed. In that sense, Quran, Islam and we do not deny the existence of a limited evolution, though we do not see to label this with the name of “evolution”. There is a development going on in the universe, but it does not mean that all these things happen without anyone handling these processes. In the processes taking place before our very eyes, Allah does not create most things out of nothingness. Of course, there are things He creates out of nothing. Which ones? This is not known to us. Is this so important? We don’t think so. “How did sun come into existence? Was it formed with the reaction of hydrogen with helium, or in another way? The answers to these questions and how such processes take place are not important in terms of the existence of the creator. It is very important for us to understand that no scientific finding or no process could change the following fact: There is an order here, a result that can’t be achieved coincidentally and we have a deduction made out of this result, that is, from the fact that this visible design and art bring about certain benefits. This conclusion is the following: “This huge unconscious sun and the atoms it contains do not move on their own. They must be the result of a knowledge, will and power.” The essential purpose of Quran is to teach about the creator and the Master of Art and to prove his existence with the order of the matter. It is important to come to this point. This is the perspective in which Quran is interested. The rest is thought to be details that do not harm the real purpose. It happens this way or that way. This is the field of science. Quran leaves this completely as a free field. It says: “You should search and learn about it” and encourages the efforts in that sense. But whatever the processes and workings and the styles are, it asks us certainly to notice this order and through this to reach to the existence of the creator. 

Because, the order does not change, stays as it is, without being affected. What is important is to notice this fact. Quran teaches us about this order. Is it evolution, science, multiple universes or the creator? There is no need to make such a duality, differentiation, and to make a choice between them. In fact, all work together!

There is only one mechanism! You can’t think of a plane separately from the law of thermodynamics. The point that we object to is why the engineer of that plane is not taken into account. This is all we care for. Can’t a creator, who created this universe, create also multiple universes? In fact, Quran starts with the expression “God of All Universes” What if there are multiple-universes; does it mean there is no creator? Of course not! The Creator could create multiple universes as well.

Another important point to be made is this: once it is understood that living things cannot come into existence coincidentally, it is not important whether they do so through evolution, or suddenly out of nothingness; or how much of it is the result of evolution and how much is made out of nothingness. The important thing is that this mechanism can’t function coincidentally. Otherwise, He can decide to create through a development process, and create progressively; as long as we can see the processes. As a matter of fact he creates in this way.

For instance, if the baby in mother’s womb was created all of a sudden out of nothingness, we would not have the opportunity to see that spectacular art and this splendid process. Perhaps, this is the wisdom of this truth. He does not create abruptly. This is also contrary to the secret of the trial. If creation were abrupt, without material causes, timelessly and out of nothing, they would say: “Oh, really, have a look, God creates! Could this be denied?” and out of necessity, everybody would have to accept it. Then there would be no meaning of the proposal and the trial forwarded to human beings by the religion.

However, once it is dependent upon a process, time is passed by, and some causes seem to exist, it seems to be happening coincidentally. In videos, which show the formation and development of plants in much shorter times, reducing a process which takes place within weeks to a few seconds, it can be seen by naked eye how that plant comes into existence in a miraculous way. If this formation happened suddenly rather than taking place in time, there would be some drawbacks which we have already mentioned.

In sum, we reject an understanding of evolution, which is based on the coming into existence of living beings by evolving and multiplying from each other on the grounds that it is not only against divine wisdom, power and divine revelation but also there is not enough evidence all over the world supporting such an allegation. Since development (or progression), that is the act of creation and development within a certain time period is a visible reality, we accept its existence. However, we do not find it appropriate to use the term “evolution” which is used for species of living things evolved from each other through mechanisms based on coincidence.

Our second point is related to the explanation of the miracles in Quran with some scientific findings.

In our opinion, trying to prove the miracles in Quran by explaining them with scientific findings has important limitations. For instance, let us say, sometime later, it is proved that these scientific findings are false, then what happens? Would it prove that Quran is wrong?

Then it can be said and it is in fact said that: “You just come up after these scientific findings are discovered, just because Quran is indicating them. Where have you been until this time? Therefore, we should not depend on them. They could just be used as nice arguments to prove that they are not against indicators, signs and scientific findings. However, basing the reality of our case just on scientific findings could do harm to it for the reasons just mentioned above.

Yes, such evidence could only be strong supportive indicators. However, we should approach to our target from its fundamentals. Although Mu’cizât-ı Kur’âniye (Miracles of Quran)  a monumental treatise in  Risale-i Nur Collection, is a marvellous work explaining the miraculousness of Quran, you  could hardly find any example of Quran’s miracles based on scientific findings (20th Word of Risale Collection, which shows that the prophet’s miracles mentioned in Quran are indicators of future technological developments, is a Treatise with a very different approach and a different starting point and it has no direct relevance to our subject). The works in the collection of Risale-I Nur have the characteristic of a guide to The Truths of Quran that will continue its function until the day of reckoning. Quran and Risale-I Nur shows the order existing in the matter and among objects. In this sense, what the mode of formation of the matter/objects and its processes are and how they develop do not matter much. Their scientific process and functioning could be different. While science says “A” for it, it could say “B” tomorrow and “C” the other day. But, the order stays where it is and shines like the sun. Quran and Risale-i Nur tell us this: “For sure, search for the explanation of the way it works, but definitely see this order!”

The essence of the issue is faith while the evidences are subsidiary factors. Even if these evidences are refuted one by one, the truth of faith which stays fixed above is not shaken, nothing happens to it. Therefore, it is necessary not to depend on scientific findings or let’s say, not to base the reality of the truth of faith on scientific findings in a definite way. The points made in the Treatise of Miracles of Quran (Mu’cizât-ı Kur’âniye) seems to us as much stronger, conclusive and unshakable evidences which won’t undergo serious changes. Today we have Bing Bang, but what about tomorrow, if something else is brought up? Then, we can be asked: “The Verses was pointing to “Big Bang, Now what?” In order not to face such problems, we should not construct our evidences too much on such points.”

We see Risale-i Nur as a way that does not base the truth of Quran and Islam on scientific findings but rather develops totally original evidences. In this sense, we think, it is a very specialized book. Maybe there are hundreds of books explaining the miracles of Quran, and most of them are useful, nice books. However, Risale-i Nur brings before us a much wider road, which is more strong and based on Quran’s truths. It goes through the fundamentals with unshakable and unchangeable evidences. The evidences brought about by Risale-i Nur will be constant and unaffected after 100 years and even 200 years whatever scientific novelties are revealed. They can be understood, used and accepted by all; they won’t change and you can use these evidences until the day of judgement. This is why, in our personal opinion there is not a second example similar to Risale-i Nur from this perspective.